Wednesday, July 14, 2010

'Hope' Floats:
Hey Hollywood, Time to Put Your Money Where Your Morality Is

A coalition of nearly twenty U.S.-based human rights and peace groups has joined the global justice community and numerous foreign governments in vowing to send more humanitarian aid ships to break the illegal Israeli blockade of Gaza this coming Fall. The coalition, united under the mantle US To Gaza, includes activist organizations such as CodePink, Jews Say No, Veterans For Peace, Voices for Creative Non-Violence, and Jewish Voice For Peace.

In the wake of the deadly Israeli raid on an international flotilla carrying over 10,000 tons of humanitarian aid and hundreds of civilian passengers, during which nine activists were murdered (if not outright executed) by Israeli commandos in international waters, the global call to end the US-backed Israeli siege has grown even more forceful.

Later this year, boats from Europe, Canada, South Africa, India, and the Middle East are expected to set sail for Gaza once again. US To Gaza, which states on its website that "America pays for the blockade with our tax dollars; Americans must join together to end this collective punishment of 1.5 million Palestinians," aims to add a vital American element to this new Freedom Flotilla.

The U.S. boat, which will be named The Audacity of Hope (irony intended), is expected to carry an American peace delegation of forty to sixty passengers and will join its international flotilla partners en route. But purchasing a suitable ship, securing a sailing crew, obtaining the needed licenses and registration, gathering tons of humanitarian aid, and sailing for Gaza is a costly endeavor. It is estimated that at least $370,000 needs to be raised from private donors in the next month for the U.S. ship to become, not merely hopeful audacity, but a necessary reality.

All in all, $370,000 isn't that much money. For instance, South Carolina Republican Congressman Joe Wilson raised hundreds of thousands of dollars from individual donors giving less than $200 just because he called Barack Obama a liar. If a jackass like Wilson can raise that kind of money for shouting a disingenuous falsehood, raising funds for a just cause like breaking the illegal Gaza blockade shouldn't be that hard.

Sure, the fund-raising goal can be hit with 3,700 people each pledging $100 or a mere 370 donations of $1,000 each. But why is the bar for funding justice and fighting illegal collective punishment so low? Where are the big donors who could single-handedly buy a boat and subsidize the entire delegation? Why does it seem like such a stretch for American supporters of human rights and international law to send an armada of siege-breaking ships to Gaza?

Perhaps, in order to open borders and ship a little bit of hope to suffering Palestinians in the Middle East, US to Gaza organizers should be looking for a lot of financial support from open wallets on the West Coast.

Hollywood has no shortage of outspoken Israel supporters, ethnic cleansing enthusiasts, and racist, right-wing nutjobs. The Zionism, publicly professed or not, of famous musicians and movie stars takes many forms and runs the gamut of willful ignorance to actively insane.

There are those who ignore or condemn the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement and promote Israeli hasbara like Paul McCartney, Elton John, Madonna, Rod Stewart, Bob Dyan, Leonard Cohen, Metallica, Rihanna, Missy Elliot, Adam Sandler, Alex Trebek, Jerry Bruckheimer, Jon Avnet, Adam Arkin, Lenny Kravitz, Ed Zwick, Chazz Palminteri, Paul Reiser, Seth Rogen, Robert Duvall, Halle Berry, David Cronenberg, Norman Jewison, Saul Rubinek, Jerry Seinfeld, Lisa Kudrow, Sacha Baron Cohen, Minnie Driver, and Natalie Portman (who was also a proud research assistant of Alan Dershowitz and is thanked in his appalling book The Case for Israel); there are those who oppose resistance to Israeli aggression and expansion and laud Israeli assaults that take the lives of thousands of Palestinian and Lebanese civilians like actors Michael Douglas, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, Danny De Vito, Don Johnson, James Woods, Kelly Preston, Patricia Heaton, Doug Liman, Gary Sinise, Kristen Chenowith, Michael Chiklis, Vivica A. Fox, Nicole Kidman, Pat Sajak, and William Hurt, along with filmmakers like Ridley Scott, Tony Scott, Michael Mann, William Friedkin, Ivan Reitman, Richard Donner, and Sam Raimi.

There are those, like producer Lawrence Bender, who see Israel as an eternal victim, besieged by oppressive Palestinians, and claim that "Nobody realizes how badly the Israelis are suffering. Obviously the Palestinians are suffering - but people need to understand that Israel needs help" and there are those, like actor Joshua Malina, who are baffled by the suggestion that "somehow Israel is the bully and the Palestinians are the underdog."

There are Zionist zealots like John Malkovich and Bill Maher and there's also Jon Voigt.

There are celebrities who advocate for peace, love, and understanding, like Richard Dreyfuss, yet somehow believe a "Jewish" state isn't inherently discriminatory. There's Jason Alexander, who, despite his work with the two-state promoting OneVoice/Imagine Peace project, was an honored guest at last year's Friends of the Israeli Defense Forces [sic] Fundraising Gala and shill for Jewish television programming that endorses violent, fanatical Zionist settler ideologies. There are fashion designers like Elie Tahari, who donated a whopping $100,000 at this year's IDF love-fest in March.

With friends like these, it's no wonder that the IDF, a foreign military that oppresses and occupies an indigenous population, raised over $20 million in one night at the Waldorf-Astoria in Manhattan. But donors here in the United States don't only fund the Occupation, they also fund illegal Jewish settlements - to the tune of tax-free hundreds of millions over the past decade - that have now aggressively stolen and colonized over 42% of the West Bank.

So where are their anti-occupation, pro-international law counterparts, especially the ones with equally deep pockets? The truth is they're everywhere.

From Alice Walker to Vanessa Redgrave, Harry Belafonte to Viggo Mortensen, Julie Christie, Wallace Shawn, Alan Rickman, Jonathan Demme, Stephen King, Ralph Fiennes, Bill Irwin, Tilda Swinton, Wim Wenders, Debra Winger, Uma Thurman, Tony Kushner, Roger Ebert, Richard Gere, John Cusack, Sally Kirkland, Terry Gilliam, Michael Palin, Danny Glover, Oliver Stone, Ed Asner, Sophie Fiennes, Casey Kasem, and Jeremy Pikser, celebrity support for Palestinian freedom and an end to the Israeli occupation and blockade is widespread in Tinseltown.

Actresses Salma Hayek, Drew Barrymore, Brooke Shields, Andie MacDowell, Lucy Liu, Whitney Houston and Sharon Stone all had their pictures removed from the website of blood diamond dealer Lev Leviev after being alerted to Leviev's criminal funding of illegal West Bank settlements.

Musicians like Mos Def, Laurie Anderson, Boots Riley, Steve Earle, David Byrne, Neil Young, and Santana, all publicly oppose Israel's systematic oppression and land theft and support the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel. Both Billy Bragg and Patti Smith have written and performed songs in honor of Rachel Corrie, with Smith also having written about the 2006 Israeli assault on the Lebanese village of Qana, which killed nearly 30 civilians, over half of whom were children.

Annie Lennox and Brian Eno spoke out against the 2008-9 Israel slaughter of over 1,400 Palestinians in Gaza and, more recently, Rage Against The Machine's Zack de la Rocha condemned Israel's Gaza blockade on stage during a concert in London. This past Saturday, July 10, for the first time in five years, Pink Floyd's David Gilmour and Roger Waters teamed up to perform at a HOPING Foundation benefit, which raised £350,000 (over $538,000) for Palestinian children living in refugee camps in the West Bank, Gaza, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon. The organization was co-founded by fashion designer (and Siggy's great-granddaughter) Bell Freud in 2003.

Megastars Dustin Hoffman and Meg Ryan canceled their attendance at this year's annual Jerusalem Film Festival the day after Israel's bloody raid on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla and recent performances by The Pixies, Elvis Costello, Gorillaz Sound System, The Klaxons, Devendra Banhart, Gil Scott Heron, and Snoop Dogg were also canceled for similar - if not identical - reasons.

All of these well-heeled celebrities should take their courageous boycott of Israeli apartheid and aggression even further by funding more humanitarian aid ships. With their help, supplementing the support of small donors, the illegal blockade can indeed be broken.


The Israeli policy of brutal blockade is clear. In 2006, after Palestinians democratically elected Hamas to the shock and chagrin of both Israel and the US (who had insisted on the elections in the first place), an economic and commercial siege was put into place by Israel as a punishment for Palestinian self-determination. As Dov Weisglass, adviser to then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, jokingly declared, "It's like an appointment with a dietitian. The Palestinians in Gaza will get a lot thinner, but won't die."

It should be recalled that Weisglass, when serving as senior adviser to Ariel Sharon a few years earlier, told Ha'aretz in October 2004, "The significance [of the 2005 Gaza Disengagement Plan] is the freezing of the peace process. And when you freeze that process, you prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, and you prevent a discussion on the refugees, the borders and Jerusalem. Effectively, this whole package called the Palestinian state, with all that it entails, has been removed indefinitely from our agenda. And all this with authority and permission. All with a presidential blessing and the ratification of both houses of Congress."

Elaborating on the real purpose of the Plan, Weisglass boasted:
"The disengagement is actually formaldehyde. It supplies the amount of formaldehyde that's necessary so that there will not be a political process with the Palestinians...The disengagement plan makes it possible for Israel to park conveniently in an interim situation that distances us as far as possible from political pressure. It legitimizes our contention that there is no negotiating with the Palestinians. There is a decision here to do the minimum possible in order to maintain our political situation. The decision is proving itself.
The Gaza Disengagement Plan, pushed by Sharon's newly-minted Kadima Party, called for all 7,500 Jewish colonists and their Israeli military protectors to be removed from the territory. Nevertheless, the Plan stated that, even after their withdrawal, "The State of Israel will monitor and supervise the outer envelope on land, will have exclusive control of the Gaza airspace, and will continue its military activity along the Gaza Strip's coastline." Also, the Plan stressed, "The Gaza Strip will be completely demilitarized of arms" while "The State of Israel reserves the basic right to self defense, which includes taking preventive measures as well as the use of force against threats originating in the Gaza Strip."

Additionally, the Plan asserted Israel's ongoing control over all vital resources to Gaza, maintaining, "As a rule, Israel will enable the continued supply of electricity, water, gas and fuel to the Palestinians, under the existing arrangements and full compensation." And yet, despite presiding over a total matrix of occupation, Israel still attempted to pretend that, as a result of the Disengagement, "there will be no basis to the claim that the Strip is occupied land."

Collective punishment, via forced deprivation and near-starvation, is unequivocally illegal. International law is quite clear in this regard. Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which has governed Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza since 1967 (and has been repeatedly affirmed by both the UN Security Council and General Assembly), states plainly:
"No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited."
Furthermore, though the Israeli intention may not have been to kill Palestinians in Gaza via food and medicine shortages, they have more than made up for it with their subsequent use of bombs, missiles, tank shells, bullets, depleted uranium, flechettes, white phosphorous, and DIME weaponry.

Still, Israeli officials such as former-Prime Minster, now Defense Minister, Ehud Barak and Director-General of the Foreign Ministry, Yossi Gal, continue to claim that "there is no shortage in humanitarian aid to Gaza, as food, fuel and supplies are regularly transferred into Gaza by international organizations."

No mention is made of the fact that all building material, such as cement, plaster and dry wall, is banned from entering Gaza, in addition to the absurd prohibition of so-called "dual use" medicines, rope, wood, razors, light bulbs, textiles and fabrics, sewing and hypodermic needles, sewing machines, candles, matches, mattresses, bedsheets, pillowcases, blankets, cutlery, books, newspapers, coffee, tea, cigarettes, clothing, shoes, pencils and paper, fresh meat, seeds, nuts, cilantro, sage, cardamom, nutmeg, ginger, cumin, vinegar, biscuits, candy, potato chips, jam, chocolate, french fries, canned or dried fruit, notebooks, empty flowerpots, fishing rods or line, livestock, musical instruments, and children's toys.

Obviously, Israeli officials take no note of the findings of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN which has reported that 61% of Gazans are "food insecure," of which "65% are children under 18 years;" the level of anemia in infants is as high as 65.5%, about 70% of Gazans live on less than $1 a day, 75% rely on food aid, and 60% have no daily access to water.

As Rebecca Sargent of the Peace and Collaborative Development Network notes, "Much of the population remains unemployed and thus have no money to buy supplies for themselves. The UN resolution 1860 calls for the unfettered access of aid and commercial goods to Gaza, although it would appear this call has been mostly ignored by the Israeli government's blockade."

Also, as of the end of 2009, a U.N. report found that "insufficient food and medicine is reaching Gazans, producing a further deterioration of the mental and physical health of the entire civilian population since Israel launched Operation Cast Lead against the territory," and also "blamed the blockade for continued breakdowns of the electricity and sanitation systems due to the Israeli refusal to let spare parts needed for repair get through the crossings." Since June 2007, "the number of Palestine refugees unable to access food and lacking the means to purchase even the most basic items, such as soap, school stationery and safe drinking water, has tripled" and over 80 UN and aid agencies agree that "the formal economy in Gaza has collapsed."

On May 31, the six-ship Gaza Freedom Flotilla was lethally attacked in international waters (the ships had no intention of sailing through Israeli territory) about 80 miles (130 kilometers) off the Gaza coast in an early morning raid by elite Israeli commandos. The attack was conducted after Israel cut off all communications from the ships and surrounded the flotilla with over 20 naval vessels and warships, along with multiple helicopters. In addition to the 45 highly-trained and heavily-armed commandos who rappelled onto the largest ship, the Turkish-flagged Mavi Marmara, murdering at least 9 civilians and wounding about 60 more, about 650 other Israeli troops, including surveillance and support troops alongside those who actually boarded the ships, took part in the illegal assault on the flotilla.

The Gaza Freedom Flotilla carried 10,000 tons of aid on board, all of which was "unquestionably humanitarian in nature," and included 6,000 tons of cement, more than 2,000 tons of iron, 100 prefabricated houses, 500 wheelchairs, crutches, medical equipment, wood and glass for building, electric generators, water purifiers, a mobile dental care facility, and food and had even been confirmed not to be transporting any weaponry by authorities before its departure.

Another aid ship, the MV Rachel Corrie, carrying 550 tons of cement, 20 tons of paper for printing school books, 25 tons of school supplies, 12 tons of sports equipment and 150 tons of medical supplies, was also illegally seized by the Israeli Navy a few days later.

On June 24, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced an "easing" of the four-year-long Gaza siege, declaring, "Today, after we lifted the civilian blockade of Gaza there is no reason or justification for further flotillas."

Israeli newspaper, Ha'aretz reports that "The highlight of the new policy is to be the creation and distribution of a detailed 'black list' of goods that will not be permitted into the Gaza Strip," continuing that, now, "Only weapons or 'dual-use' materials that could be used to manufacture weapons will be on the list. Any item not on the list will be permitted into Gaza."

As a result of this new policy, items such as car parts, agricultural and fishing tools, cosmetics, perfumes, soda, juice, jam, spices, shaving cream, potato chips, cookies and candy are now being imported into Gaza.

Nevertheless, the siege has not ended. Even though coriander, chocolate, and Coca-Cola are now allowed through Israel's military checkpoints, goods such as cement, steel, iron, fertilizers, gas tanks, drilling equipment and water disinfectant are still prohibited. In fact, The Los Angeles Times reveals that "the new list of banned and restricted items, which fills several hundred pages, still includes goods and supplies vital to Gaza's economic recovery."

Consequently, Karin Laub of Associated Press reports that "because Israel will continue to ban most travel and exports and restrict the import of desperately needed construction materials, the new rules are unlikely to restore the territory's devastated economy or allow rebuilding of all that was destroyed in last year's war [sic]."

In short, Israel's ongoing crime against humanity in Gaza continues. As long as Israel maintains its military control of Gaza's economy, land and sea borders, airspace, restricts (or outright denies) the freedom of movement of its 1.5 million imprisoned inhabitants, and continues murdering Palestinians with Apache helicopters, F-15 and F-16 bombers, unmanned drones and remote-controlled machine guns, Gaza will not be free.

If the negative international attention Israel received after the Mavi Marmara massacre led to the so-called "easing" of the Gaza siege, there's no telling what a constant barrage of boats might do. Therefore, until this collective punishment of innocent civilians ceases completely and Israel is held accountable for its crimes, more boats must continue to sail to Gaza. Among those boats should be a massive American contingent, funded by bold and steadfast believers in self-determination, human rights, and international law. We have paid for the Israeli oppression of Palestine for so long with our tax dollars, it's now time to fight for Palestinian freedom with our tax-exempt donations.

And so, to all you stars of summer blockbusters and sold-out stadiums, start giving generously so that a fleet of blockade-busting boats can start their engines.


To DONATE to US to Gaza, click below:


Nima Shirazi said...

In the original version of this article, I gave actor Richard Dreyfuss sort of a bum rap.

I say "sort of" because I had first described him as a "Zionist zealot" of the John Malkovich stripe, which is not true.

He's actually just an average, so-called progressive Zionist, who believes the security of Israel is "a bottom line," a "Jewish" state can be a moral state (rather than, by definition, discriminatory), and that the illegal occupations of and settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank are merely "an absolutely grievous political error," instead of an absolutely deliberate, century-old policy of dispossession, dehumanization, and ethnic cleansing.

As such, I apologize for initially associating Dreyfuss with a creep like Malkovich, but still think he should drop Zionism altogether.

Saurabh Kumar Shahi said...

Nima, I finally managed to read the piece. It is as informative as ever. But as you yourself would have pondered while listing the names, The pro-Israeli zealots are mostly big guns whereas with the honourable exceptions of Uma Thurman, Dustin Hoffman, and my all time favourite Harry Belafonte, the pro-Palestinian camp is severely diluted. This is an indication why the occupation has continued even after half a century. The Hasbara machinery in Hollywood is way way stronger than the people who value freedom and human rights. But I am positive things will change. I believe--and this believe is strengthen by my experience as a foreign correspondent--that many mid-rung and high-rung zionists in Hollywood are merely so because of their fear from the Lobby or simply because being pro-Israeli is a sort of fad or "in thing" in America. If the Humanist lobby gets an upper hand, many will desert the sinking ship. Otherwise how could you explain bimbos like Madonna, Rihanna, Nicole Kidman and Hilton supporting Israeli crimes. These bimbos dont have even the basic understanding of the Middle Eastern Issues, or for than matter any issue. They are just plain idiots who have joined the powerful ranks. But this will surely change.

Proud Australian Zionist said...

As distinct from you, i suppose, who support Hamas' declaration to annihilate Jews and Israel.

It's not Jews bombing, killing, torturing Christians, Hindus around the world and honour ki9lling young girls - it's Muslims!

Muslims and Islam (and Iran) are the greatest threat to peace in this and all generations.

Including you two Islamic liars.

Nima Shirazi said...


Furiously typing accusations without providing even the most cursory of evidence to back them up is somewhat may want to put in a little more effort next time.

Where, exactly, do I write of my "support" for Hamas' 1988 declaration? I'm curious to read it myself, so any help would be much appreciated.

Even though your comment about Muslims bombing, killing, and torturing Christians and Hindus is completely bizarre and has no relevance whatsoever to the discussion at hand, I do wonder if you could be so kind as to point out where this is all taking place? Clearly, all those Muslim F-16 and Apache helicopter air strikes on Christian villages and refugee camps must get hard to keep track of!

Also, you are aware that about 30% of all Palestinians are Christian, right?

As your concern seems to be for young girls, I'm sure you are very worried about the conditions of Palestinian children and mourn the death of 10-year-old Abir Aramin who was shot in the back of the head by Israeli soldiers on her way home from school.

Clearly, Muslims are the greatest threat to peace, I mean, just look at all those countries they don't invade or occupy and all those US-backed dictatorships they suffer under. And just look at all those nuclear weapons Muslims have, with Pakistan having at most 100, while the other (all non-Muslim) nuclear states languish in vulnerability with only 22,900 nukes of their own!

And, by the way, I'm not a Muslim, I'm an atheist, so calling me "Islamic" doesn't make any sense.

PAZ, while your appalling bigotry and weak attempts to claim cultural supremacy are plain for all to see, your intellect and research skills leaves much to be desired.

Perhaps you should stop being so "proud" of encouraging a 19th Century settler-colonial ideology that requires ethnic cleansing, land theft, and deep-seated racism for its "success," abandon the mindset of people like Pauline Hanson and the One Nation Party and, instead, listen to fellow countrymen like historian Henry Reynolds and journalist John Pilger a bit more.

You might learn something. Anything.

David said...

Did you read Bernard Avishai's condemnation of BDS in The Nation (a couple of weeks ago)? It would be a more interesting argument for you to contend with than Mr. PAZ.

take care,

Nima Shirazi said...

Thank you, David, I agree.

My latest essay addresses Avishai's disinterest in boycott and divestment (he is more positive about sanctions, actually) and can be read here:

The Thin Green Line

Thanks again for reading and getting in touch.

dj said...

One, little change: The name of the Rage Against the Machine vocalist is Zack de la Rocha, not Alex.

Great, great post!

Nima Shirazi said...

Thanks for the heads-up, dj.

Honestly, I can't believe that typo wasn't caught by anyone (including myself) until now! Whoops.

Thanks again for reading.